Fijian vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,505,176 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.085. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.005% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 4.6 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($74,205 compared to $67,792, a difference of 9.5%), per capita income ($36,690 compared to $33,921, a difference of 8.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $52,509, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $45,566, a difference of 0.090%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,063, a difference of 0.15%), and median earnings ($40,193 compared to $39,448, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 60.9%), family poverty (10.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 56.5%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 52.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.6% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 22.5%), receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 29.3%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 35.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 99.8%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 89.8%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (3.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 75.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 11.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 27.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and married-couple households (46.1% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.1%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and average family size (3.36 compared to 3.52, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 5.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.37%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 40.2%), doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 30.5%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 52.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 14.5%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.46%), male disability (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (13.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 1.2%).