Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Ecuador
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Ecuador

Sioux

Poor
Fair
2,063
SOCIAL INDEX
18.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
272nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Ecuador Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 141,454,883 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Ecuador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.455. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ecuador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.059% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ecuador corresponds to an increase of 58.9 Sioux.
Immigrants from Ecuador Integration in Sioux Communities

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($41,195 compared to $33,921, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($80,341 compared to $67,792, a difference of 18.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($89,673 compared to $77,089, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,030 compared to $52,509, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 8.2%), and median female earnings ($38,644 compared to $35,063, a difference of 10.2%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Income
Income MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$41,195
Tragic
$33,921
Median Family Income
Tragic
$92,837
Tragic
$82,386
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,341
Tragic
$67,792
Median Earnings
Tragic
$44,462
Tragic
$39,448
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,474
Tragic
$45,566
Median Female Earnings
Poor
$38,644
Tragic
$35,063
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,722
Tragic
$46,417
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$89,673
Tragic
$77,089
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,462
Tragic
$81,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$54,030
Tragic
$52,509
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.5%
Exceptional
24.3%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 77.1%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.6% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 56.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 49.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.8%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
Poverty
Tragic
14.3%
Tragic
19.8%
Families
Tragic
11.1%
Tragic
15.9%
Males
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
18.7%
Females
Tragic
15.6%
Tragic
20.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
28.6%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.6%
Tragic
23.0%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.4%
Tragic
25.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
25.3%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
25.6%
Single Males
Excellent
12.5%
Tragic
22.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
31.3%
Single Fathers
Average
16.3%
Tragic
23.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.3%
Tragic
38.8%
Married Couples
Tragic
6.7%
Tragic
8.7%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.1%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.0%
Tragic
16.8%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 53.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.9% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 5.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.4% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
Unemployment
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
7.4%
Males
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
8.4%
Females
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.4%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
19.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Tragic
11.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
8.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.4%
Tragic
8.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Fair
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.5%
Tragic
9.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Poor
7.9%
Tragic
11.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
13.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
7.9%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 34.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.3% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Tragic
61.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.0%
Exceptional
41.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
72.3%
Poor
74.6%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
79.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.3%
Tragic
80.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.2%
Tragic
78.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 37.9%), births to unmarried women (33.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.40%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.3%), and currently married (43.2% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
Family Households
Exceptional
64.8%
Good
64.6%
Family Households with Children
Excellent
27.7%
Exceptional
28.1%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
42.9%
Tragic
41.5%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.32
Exceptional
3.52
Single Father Households
Poor
2.4%
Tragic
3.3%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Tragic
8.5%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.2%
Tragic
41.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.8%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.7%
Tragic
41.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 136.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 88.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 18.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 40.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 68.5%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
23.8%
Good
10.1%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
76.2%
Excellent
90.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
40.5%
Exceptional
56.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
22.6%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
8.0%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 74.3%), master's degree (13.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 27.3%), and bachelor's degree (34.7% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (53.4% compared to 53.0%, a difference of 0.78%), college, under 1 year (58.7% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Exceptional
98.6%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
98.5%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Exceptional
98.5%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
98.0%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.7%
Exceptional
97.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
93.3%
Exceptional
97.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
91.8%
Exceptional
95.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
94.4%
11th Grade
Tragic
89.1%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
87.5%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
84.8%
Tragic
87.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
81.0%
Tragic
82.6%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
58.7%
Tragic
59.4%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.4%
Tragic
53.0%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
42.2%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.7%
Tragic
29.1%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.8%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.5%

Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ecuador and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 62.5%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 47.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 43.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.46%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and disability age over 75 (47.4% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Ecuador vs Sioux Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from EcuadorSioux
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.4%
Tragic
12.7%
Females
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.8%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.7%
Tragic
13.9%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
23.7%
Tragic
27.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.4%
Tragic
49.7%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Cognitive
Good
17.2%
Average
17.3%
Ambulatory
Average
6.1%
Tragic
6.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Fair
2.5%