Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,189,093 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Trinidad and Tobago communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.128. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago corresponds to a decrease of 8.9 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (19.3% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 25.8%), per capita income ($41,476 compared to $33,921, a difference of 22.3%), and median household income ($80,373 compared to $67,792, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($55,598 compared to $52,509, a difference of 5.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,347 compared to $81,750, a difference of 11.7%), and median male earnings ($51,376 compared to $45,566, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 71.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.0% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 64.4%), and single female poverty (20.9% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.5%), receiving food stamps (15.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 6.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.1% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 50.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 47.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 45.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (14.6% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 37.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 4.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.3% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (71.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 53.7%), births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 11.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (41.9% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 0.15%), family households (64.2% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.60%), and married-couple households (41.2% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (24.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 144.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 94.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (76.8% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 17.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (40.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 41.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (13.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 69.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 48.9%), master's degree (14.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 32.3%), and bachelor's degree (35.3% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 0.20%), ged/equivalency (82.8% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.24%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 60.9%), hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 46.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 39.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.62%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 4.4%).