Czech vs Sioux Community Comparison
COMPARE
Czech
Sioux
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Czechs
Sioux
8,484
SOCIAL INDEX
82.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
70th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sioux Integration in Czech Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,010,500 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.014. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to a decrease of 4.0 Sioux.
Czech vs Sioux Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($44,595 compared to $33,921, a difference of 31.5%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $82,386, a difference of 28.5%), and median household income ($86,164 compared to $67,792, a difference of 27.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $46,417, a difference of 10.8%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $35,063, a difference of 11.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,244 compared to $52,509, a difference of 16.6%).
Income Metric | Czech | Sioux |
Per Capita Income | Good $44,595 | Tragic $33,921 |
Median Family Income | Excellent $105,839 | Tragic $82,386 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,164 | Tragic $67,792 |
Median Earnings | Good $47,221 | Tragic $39,448 |
Median Male Earnings | Excellent $56,546 | Tragic $45,566 |
Median Female Earnings | Poor $38,992 | Tragic $35,063 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,421 | Tragic $46,417 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Good $96,525 | Tragic $77,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Excellent $103,507 | Tragic $81,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,244 | Tragic $52,509 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 29.2% | Exceptional 24.3% |
Czech vs Sioux Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 116.3%), family poverty (7.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 113.9%), and male poverty (9.8% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 90.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 34.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 40.0%), and single father poverty (17.0% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 40.7%).
Poverty Metric | Czech | Sioux |
Poverty | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 19.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.4% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Exceptional 9.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Fair 20.4% | Tragic 28.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.9% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.5% | Tragic 26.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 13.8% | Tragic 25.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.1% | Tragic 25.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.2% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.5% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 31.3% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 17.0% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Mothers | Good 28.9% | Tragic 38.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 8.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.2% | Tragic 16.8% |
Czech vs Sioux Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 102.2%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 89.5%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 85.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 0.070%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%).
Unemployment Metric | Czech | Sioux |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.4% |
Males | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Females | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.3% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.0% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.7% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Average 7.6% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.7% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.9% |
Czech vs Sioux Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.7%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 5.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.7%).
Labor Participation Metric | Czech | Sioux |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Excellent 65.4% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 43.6% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 78.5% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.5% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.3% | Tragic 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.9% | Tragic 78.0% |
Czech vs Sioux Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 50.3%), single father households (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 43.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 10.9%).
Family Structure Metric | Czech | Sioux |
Family Households | Good 64.5% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.5% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 41.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.11 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Single Father Households | Good 2.3% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.5% | Tragic 41.0% |
Czech vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 46.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 0.30%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Czech | Sioux |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.9% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 93.3% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 61.5% | Exceptional 56.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Czech vs Sioux Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 38.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 33.6%), and bachelor's degree (38.0% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.030%), and 5th grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.030%).
Education Level Metric | Czech | Sioux |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.5% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.6% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 97.1% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.4% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.2% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.1% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.1% | Tragic 59.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Excellent 60.6% | Tragic 53.0% |
Associate's Degree | Good 47.2% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Average 38.0% | Tragic 29.1% |
Master's Degree | Average 14.7% | Tragic 10.7% |
Professional Degree | Average 4.4% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Good 1.9% | Tragic 1.5% |
Czech vs Sioux Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 21.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 5.5%).
Disability Metric | Czech | Sioux |
Disability | Tragic 12.0% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Average 11.3% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.4% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 45.7% | Tragic 49.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Exceptional 16.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Excellent 6.0% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |