Immigrants from Oceania vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 171,509,224 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.698. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.442% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 441.9 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,220 compared to $33,921, a difference of 33.3%), median household income ($89,100 compared to $67,792, a difference of 31.4%), and median family income ($106,453 compared to $82,386, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 5.4%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,063, a difference of 14.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $46,417, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 81.4%), single male poverty (12.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 79.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 35.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 44.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 83.3%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 75.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 63.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 35.4%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 35.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.18%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and average family size (3.29 compared to 3.52, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 3.6%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.16%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 39.6%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 37.4%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.080%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 56.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.22%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 3.6%).