Latvian vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 129,552,991 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.684. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.236% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 236.3 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $33,921, a difference of 55.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $82,386, a difference of 46.0%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $67,792, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $46,417, a difference of 13.7%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 14.6%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,063, a difference of 25.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 124.0%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 123.1%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 95.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 44.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 23.9%, a difference of 45.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 46.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 100.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 88.9%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 73.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 8.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 65.9%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 47.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.9%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 6.1%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.52, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 30.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.14%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 90.7%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 85.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (97.0% compared to 97.1%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.11%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 38.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 36.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 3.9%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 10.3%).