Choctaw vs Sioux Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 162,247,837 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.541. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to an increase of 21.4 Sioux.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 15.7%), per capita income ($35,999 compared to $33,921, a difference of 6.1%), and median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $45,566, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($82,287 compared to $81,750, a difference of 0.66%), householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $52,509, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($78,168 compared to $77,089, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 38.2%), family poverty (11.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 36.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.4% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 6.5%), child poverty under the age of 5 (23.5% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 14.7%), and single female poverty (27.2% compared to 31.3%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 57.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 56.4%), and male unemployment (5.6% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 49.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 4.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 45-54 (78.2% compared to 78.0%, a difference of 0.28%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 0.0%), family households (64.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 27.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 4.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.3%), no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of high school diploma (87.8% compared to 87.9%, a difference of 0.14%), college, under 1 year (59.3% compared to 59.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and 12th grade, no diploma (89.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.7%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 25.0%), and ambulatory disability (8.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 2.9%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 6.7%).