New Zealander vs Sioux Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Sioux
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Sioux
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Sioux Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 83,011,613 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.662. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.166% in Sioux. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 166.4 Sioux.
New Zealander vs Sioux Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $33,921, a difference of 49.1%), median household income ($95,146 compared to $67,792, a difference of 40.4%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $82,386, a difference of 39.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.3%, a difference of 14.0%), householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $46,417, a difference of 14.8%), and median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,063, a difference of 21.1%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $33,921 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $82,386 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $67,792 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $39,448 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $45,566 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $35,063 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Tragic $46,417 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $77,089 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $81,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $52,509 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 24.3% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (8.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 96.0%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 95.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.1% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 75.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 31.7%), single mother poverty (29.1% compared to 38.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 42.9%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 19.8% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 15.9% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 18.7% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 20.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 28.6% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 23.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 26.9% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 25.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 25.3% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 25.6% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 22.2% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 31.3% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Tragic 23.9% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 38.8% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 8.7% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 16.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 16.8% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 93.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 86.1%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 7.4% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 8.4% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 7.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 14.4% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 19.7% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 8.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 8.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 6.6% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 5.1% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Fair 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 9.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 13.2% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 7.9% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 41.5%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 79.7%, a difference of 6.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 74.6%, a difference of 0.81%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 80.4%, a difference of 5.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Tragic 61.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Exceptional 41.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Poor 74.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 79.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 80.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 78.0% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.1%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 51.0%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 41.0%, a difference of 35.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.1%, a difference of 3.5%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.52, a difference of 11.5%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Good 64.6% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.1% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 41.5% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.52 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.3% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 8.5% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 41.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 41.0% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 23.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 90.2%, a difference of 0.17%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 1.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Good 10.1% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Excellent 90.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Exceptional 56.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Exceptional 22.6% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 8.0% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 81.9%), master's degree (18.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 71.2%), and doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 70.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.9% compared to 95.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.21%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Exceptional 98.6% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 98.5% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Exceptional 98.5% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Exceptional 98.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Exceptional 98.2% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Exceptional 98.0% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Exceptional 97.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Exceptional 97.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Exceptional 95.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Exceptional 94.4% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Fair 92.3% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 87.9% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 59.4% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 53.0% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 29.1% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 10.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.3% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.5% |
New Zealander vs Sioux Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Sioux communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 51.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 26.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 0.90%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 7.7%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 8.2%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Sioux |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Tragic 12.7% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Tragic 12.9% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Tragic 1.8% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Tragic 8.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Tragic 13.9% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 27.3% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 49.7% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Tragic 3.6% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Average 17.3% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 6.7% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Fair 2.5% |