Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Tohono O'odham
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Tohono O'odham

Immigrants from Uganda

Tragic
Good
686
SOCIAL INDEX
4.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
339th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Tohono O'odham Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 40,060,777 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Tohono O'odham communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.960. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Tohono O'odham within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Tohono O'odham corresponds to an increase of 15.3 Immigrants from Uganda.
Tohono O'odham Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,256 compared to $45,043, a difference of 48.9%), median family income ($72,193 compared to $106,188, a difference of 47.1%), and median household income ($61,663 compared to $87,553, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (22.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 12.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,248 compared to $52,374, a difference of 15.8%), and median female earnings ($33,205 compared to $40,739, a difference of 22.7%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,256
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$72,193
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$61,663
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$36,349
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$39,543
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$33,205
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$45,248
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$69,068
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,774
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$49,121
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.1%
Excellent
24.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (20.4% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 124.5%), married-couple family poverty (11.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 116.2%), and male poverty (22.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 93.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (22.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 31.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 48.9%), and single mother poverty (43.0% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 52.1%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Tragic
24.4%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
20.4%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
22.9%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
25.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
31.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
24.7%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
29.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
31.7%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
31.6%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
21.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
34.2%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
22.0%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
43.0%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.2%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
20.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
19.1%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
21.5%
Average
11.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (9.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 104.4%), male unemployment (10.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (9.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 89.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 18.3%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Tragic
8.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
10.2%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
7.7%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
13.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
22.1%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
12.5%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
12.1%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.8%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.0%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
10.2%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
10.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
8.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 25.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.2% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 17.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (74.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (77.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (68.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 10.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (77.5% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 10.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.2%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
70.4%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
31.3%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
68.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
77.5%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
77.7%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.1%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
75.1%
Exceptional
83.7%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (49.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 63.4%), single father households (3.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 60.4%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 39.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.020%), divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and family households (67.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 7.0%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Exceptional
67.1%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
37.9%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.53
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.8%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
9.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
36.8%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
49.8%
Excellent
30.5%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 56.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (84.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.0% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.9%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
15.6%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
84.7%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
50.0%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.9%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.9%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 77.2%), master's degree (9.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 71.4%), and bachelor's degree (24.4% compared to 40.7%, a difference of 66.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.020%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%), and 2nd grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.020%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Fair
97.9%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Fair
97.9%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Fair
97.8%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Fair
97.8%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.0%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
92.6%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
90.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.6%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.7%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
77.5%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
52.8%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
47.1%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
31.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
24.4%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Tohono O'odham and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 90.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (36.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 58.2%), and ambulatory disability (8.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 54.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.2%).
Tohono O'odham vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricTohono O'odhamImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
14.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
14.6%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.5%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.7%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
36.0%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
56.7%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
4.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
19.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.1%
Exceptional
2.3%