Immigrants from Spain vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 95,525,502 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Spain communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Spain within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Spain corresponds to a decrease of 7.1 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,933 compared to $45,043, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,752 compared to $95,698, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($60,750 compared to $56,064, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,560 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.3%), householder income over 65 years ($63,540 compared to $61,976, a difference of 2.5%), and median female earnings ($42,815 compared to $40,739, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 16.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.49%), and single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.50%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.67%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.7% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.2% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.2%), single mother households (5.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.35%), family households (62.4% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.52%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (50.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.8%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 15.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.0% compared to 96.0%, a difference of 0.020%), 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.020%), and 9th grade (94.9% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.040%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Spain and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (5.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.30%), ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.38%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.8%).