Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Celtic
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Celtics

Immigrants from Uganda

Average
Good
5,342
SOCIAL INDEX
50.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
179th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Celtic Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 79,920,709 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Celtic communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.719. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Celtics within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.598% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Celtics corresponds to an increase of 598.4 Immigrants from Uganda.
Celtic Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 9.4%), median female earnings ($38,283 compared to $40,739, a difference of 6.4%), and median household income ($83,193 compared to $87,553, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,608 compared to $61,976, a difference of 2.3%), per capita income ($43,621 compared to $45,043, a difference of 3.3%), and median male earnings ($54,242 compared to $56,064, a difference of 3.4%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Average
$43,621
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Fair
$101,139
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Fair
$83,193
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,732
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Average
$54,242
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,283
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,447
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,241
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Fair
$98,896
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,608
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.2%), and single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (17.0% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.84%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 1.0%), and female poverty (13.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Good
8.8%
Average
9.1%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Average
13.4%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.5%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Poor
17.9%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Fair
16.4%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Average
16.6%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
17.0%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.5%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.7%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
18.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.9%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.8%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
11.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Average
11.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 16.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 12.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.98%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 2.7%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Average
17.6%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.7%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.3%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.5%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.4%
Tragic
5.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.7%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.3%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.1%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.8%
Exceptional
83.7%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 10.3%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.1%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.6%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.9%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Tragic
63.8%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Average
2.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
47.8%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Poor
33.3%
Excellent
30.5%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 23.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 19.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 17.8%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.1%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.1%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.2%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.7%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
5.9%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.4%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.0%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.7%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.6%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
86.7%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Good
65.9%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.0%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Average
14.8%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Average
4.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Exceptional
2.2%

Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Celtic and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 45.5%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 30.0%), and male disability (13.0% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.96%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.5%).
Celtic vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricCelticImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
13.0%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.7%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.6%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.9%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.2%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Average
47.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%