Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Sioux
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Sioux

Immigrants from Uganda

Fair
Good
2,469
SOCIAL INDEX
22.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
256th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Sioux Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,372,361 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Sioux communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.967. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Sioux within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Sioux corresponds to an increase of 140.3 Immigrants from Uganda.
Sioux Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,921 compared to $45,043, a difference of 32.8%), median household income ($67,792 compared to $87,553, a difference of 29.1%), and median family income ($82,386 compared to $106,188, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.3% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($46,417 compared to $52,374, a difference of 12.8%), and median female earnings ($35,063 compared to $40,739, a difference of 16.2%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$33,921
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$82,386
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$67,792
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$39,448
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$45,566
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,063
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$46,417
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$77,089
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$81,750
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,509
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
24.3%
Excellent
24.9%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (22.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 76.2%), family poverty (15.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 74.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (23.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 70.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.8% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 37.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (28.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 37.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 37.7%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Tragic
19.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
15.9%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
18.7%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
20.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.6%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
23.0%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
26.9%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
25.2%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
25.3%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
25.6%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
22.2%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
31.3%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
23.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.8%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Tragic
8.7%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
15.3%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
16.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.8%
Average
11.9%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 80.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.4% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 78.5%), and male unemployment (8.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.19%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 9.0%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Tragic
7.4%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
8.4%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Tragic
7.0%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
14.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.7%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
8.0%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
8.4%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.1%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Fair
5.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
11.5%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
7.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (61.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 7.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
61.8%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
75.0%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.5%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Poor
74.6%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
79.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
80.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
80.2%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
78.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 39.6%), births to unmarried women (41.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 34.4%), and single mother households (8.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.17%), family households (64.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.9%), and currently married (41.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 7.3%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.5%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.52
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
3.3%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.5%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Tragic
41.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
13.2%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
41.0%
Excellent
30.5%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.17%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.67%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.4%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.1%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.8%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (10.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 55.9%), professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 54.1%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 50.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.3% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.77%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.78%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Fair
92.3%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.6%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.9%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
82.6%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
59.4%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
53.0%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
38.5%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
29.1%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.7%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Sioux and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.8% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 58.3%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 27.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.9%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and disability age over 75 (49.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 6.3%).
Sioux vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricSiouxImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.8%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.9%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
27.3%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.7%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.6%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.7%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%