Czech vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 121,741,157 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Czech communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.331. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Czechs within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.012% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Czechs corresponds to an increase of 11.6 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 17.0%), median female earnings ($38,992 compared to $40,739, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,421 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,507 compared to $103,584, a difference of 0.070%), median family income ($105,839 compared to $106,188, a difference of 0.33%), and median male earnings ($56,546 compared to $56,064, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 29.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 29.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.0%), and single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 22.7%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 22.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.28%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.30%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.31%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 16.4%), married-couple households (49.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and currently married (49.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.5% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.070%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and family households with children (27.5% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 45.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 55.0%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 17.3%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (60.6% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.74%), and kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Czech and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.8%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.22%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.36%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.82%).