Immigrants from Brazil vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 113,175,613 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.270. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.014% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to an increase of 14.2 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 8.3%), per capita income ($48,164 compared to $45,043, a difference of 6.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($100,534 compared to $95,698, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $61,976, a difference of 0.63%), median female earnings ($41,273 compared to $40,739, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $103,584, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.5% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 12.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 11.7%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (27.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.7%), and single female poverty (19.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.9%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.19%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.65%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.23, a difference of 1.8%), and divorced or separated (12.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 13.0%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.8%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.3%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.030%), 5th grade (97.3% compared to 97.2%, a difference of 0.060%), and 8th grade (95.7% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.060%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.29%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.40%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.66%).