Australian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 90,915,814 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Australian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.753. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Australians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.100% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Australians corresponds to an increase of 99.7 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,074 compared to $45,043, a difference of 15.6%), wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($107,912 compared to $95,698, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,739 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.6%), median female earnings ($43,308 compared to $40,739, a difference of 6.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,891 compared to $61,976, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 23.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 20.4%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.010%), single female poverty (20.3% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.8% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.65%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.16%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 9.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 43.0%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.7%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Australian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 20.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 10.5%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.49%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.56%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.89%).