Scandinavian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 120,672,600 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Scandinavian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.554. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scandinavians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.152% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scandinavians corresponds to an increase of 151.8 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 16.7%), median female earnings ($38,306 compared to $40,739, a difference of 6.4%), and median earnings ($46,433 compared to $48,041, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($95,596 compared to $95,698, a difference of 0.11%), householder income under 25 years ($52,654 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.54%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,969 compared to $103,584, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.1%), receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.9% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 2.3%), single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 19.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (78.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.82%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 14.2%), married-couple households (49.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and currently married (49.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.12%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and births to unmarried women (29.8% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 34.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 28.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 13.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 20.7%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (61.0% compared to 60.9%, a difference of 0.10%), nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and 2nd grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scandinavian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 34.2%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 26.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 2.7%).