Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Immigrants from Uganda

Fair
Good
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,584,023 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.068% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 67.7 Immigrants from Uganda.
Malaysian Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,194 compared to $45,043, a difference of 14.9%), median family income ($95,230 compared to $106,188, a difference of 11.5%), and median male earnings ($50,772 compared to $56,064, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.44%), householder income under 25 years ($51,615 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $61,976, a difference of 6.4%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Excellent
24.9%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (14.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 11.9%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 9.2%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 9.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.6% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.080%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), and male poverty (12.0% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.2%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Average
11.9%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 24.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.28%), unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.57%), and female unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Average
5.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Exceptional
83.7%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 14.6%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 11.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.9% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 2.0%), average family size (3.31 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.3%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.8%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Excellent
30.5%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 29.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 29.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 23.0%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
5.9%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 52.0%), professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 48.6%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 38.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.62%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.62%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.63%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Exceptional
2.2%

Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 12.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 4.7%).
Malaysian vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Exceptional
2.3%