Immigrants from Australia vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,746,967 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Australia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.132. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Australia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.045% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Australia corresponds to an increase of 45.4 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,953 compared to $45,043, a difference of 28.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($115,947 compared to $95,698, a difference of 21.2%), and median male earnings ($67,634 compared to $56,064, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($56,660 compared to $52,374, a difference of 8.2%), householder income over 65 years ($69,164 compared to $61,976, a difference of 11.6%), and wage/income gap (28.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 13.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.2% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 30.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.60%), single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 28.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.41%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 11.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.30%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.0%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), and births to unmarried women (26.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 14.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (61.3% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.4%), average family size (3.13 compared to 3.23, a difference of 3.5%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 38.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.8%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 36.9%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.2%), and doctorate degree (2.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.46%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.46%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Australia and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 15.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.62%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.95%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 2.8%).