Arapaho vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,320,362 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Arapaho communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Arapaho within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.262% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Arapaho corresponds to an increase of 261.8 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($32,345 compared to $45,043, a difference of 39.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($75,945 compared to $103,584, a difference of 36.4%), and median male earnings ($41,758 compared to $56,064, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,383 compared to $61,976, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (23.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,003 compared to $52,374, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (21.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 74.0%), single father poverty (24.0% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 43.4%), and family poverty (12.7% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.0%), and single mother poverty (33.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 18.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (19.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 156.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (12.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 146.5%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (15.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 137.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 0.55%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (76.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 8.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (62.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (73.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (37.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (47.1% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 54.4%), divorced or separated (14.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 26.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.5% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 5.9%), married-couple households (41.8% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and single mother households (7.1% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 57.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 43.9%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 9.6%), and no vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 89.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 75.4%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 66.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.4% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.12%), high school diploma (88.6% compared to 88.9%, a difference of 0.35%), and 12th grade, no diploma (90.5% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.53%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Arapaho and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 44.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 34.5%), and ambulatory disability (7.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.8%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 7.6%).