Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

COMPARE

Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Uganda
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Hmong

Immigrants from Uganda

Average
Good
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
6,298
SOCIAL INDEX
60.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
157th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Uganda Integration in Hmong Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 21,442,399 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Hmong communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.108. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Hmong within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.091% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Hmong corresponds to a decrease of 91.4 Immigrants from Uganda.
Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Uganda Communities

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,120 compared to $45,043, a difference of 18.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($88,115 compared to $103,584, a difference of 17.5%), and median family income ($91,296 compared to $106,188, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,364 compared to $52,374, a difference of 6.1%), householder income over 65 years ($56,339 compared to $61,976, a difference of 10.0%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 11.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Income
Income MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$38,120
Excellent
$45,043
Median Family Income
Tragic
$91,296
Excellent
$106,188
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,839
Excellent
$87,553
Median Earnings
Tragic
$42,111
Exceptional
$48,041
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$48,254
Excellent
$56,064
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,498
Excellent
$40,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$49,364
Good
$52,374
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$84,258
Good
$95,698
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$88,115
Excellent
$103,584
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$56,339
Good
$61,976
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Excellent
24.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (23.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 13.5%), single male poverty (14.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and single mother poverty (31.2% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.26%), family poverty (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.43%), and female poverty (13.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.94%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Poverty
Poverty MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
Poverty
Poor
12.8%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Average
9.1%
Average
9.1%
Males
Poor
11.6%
Tragic
11.8%
Females
Fair
13.9%
Fair
13.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Average
20.0%
Tragic
20.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Fair
13.9%
Average
13.5%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.5%
Fair
17.7%
Children Under 16 years
Poor
17.1%
Fair
16.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Fair
16.6%
Fair
17.0%
Girls Under 16 years
Poor
17.5%
Fair
16.8%
Single Males
Tragic
14.2%
Good
12.6%
Single Females
Tragic
23.1%
Excellent
20.3%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.9%
Tragic
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
31.2%
Exceptional
28.3%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Average
5.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.4%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.0%
Excellent
11.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Excellent
10.9%
Average
11.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 71.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 25.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.3%), male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 5.7%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Unemployment
Unemployment MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Fair
5.4%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Good
11.5%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Exceptional
16.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.4%
Good
10.2%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
5.7%
Excellent
6.5%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.0%
Average
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
3.7%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
5.1%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
13.7%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.7%
Excellent
7.4%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.7%
Tragic
10.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.1% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.9% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.67%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.7% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
64.1%
Exceptional
67.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.9%
Exceptional
80.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.7%
Exceptional
39.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.5%
Exceptional
76.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.7%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
82.4%
Exceptional
85.2%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.6%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.7%
Exceptional
83.7%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 10.0%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.2%), and divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.61%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.80%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Family Structure
Family Structure MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Tragic
62.7%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.6%
Exceptional
28.0%
Married-couple Households
Good
47.0%
Tragic
44.6%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Good
3.23
Single Father Households
Fair
2.4%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Fair
6.4%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Good
47.1%
Tragic
45.0%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Exceptional
11.7%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Excellent
30.5%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.47%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 5.2%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Good
10.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Good
90.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.8%
Fair
55.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.0%
Tragic
18.4%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 40.9%), professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and master's degree (13.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.20%), and 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.20%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Education Level
Education Level MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
No Schooling Completed
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Nursery School
Good
98.1%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Good
98.1%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Good
98.0%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Good
98.0%
Fair
97.8%
3rd Grade
Excellent
97.9%
Fair
97.7%
4th Grade
Excellent
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Fair
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Fair
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Fair
96.0%
8th Grade
Excellent
96.1%
Fair
95.6%
9th Grade
Excellent
95.2%
Average
94.8%
10th Grade
Excellent
94.1%
Fair
93.5%
11th Grade
Good
92.8%
Fair
92.3%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Fair
90.9%
High School Diploma
Average
89.1%
Fair
88.9%
GED/Equivalency
Poor
84.9%
Average
85.7%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
63.5%
Excellent
66.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
57.2%
Excellent
60.9%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
43.4%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
34.8%
Exceptional
40.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
13.4%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.6%
Exceptional
2.2%

Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Hmong and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 19.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.8%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.7%), cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (48.2% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.0%).
Hmong vs Immigrants from Uganda Disability
Disability MetricHmongImmigrants from Uganda
Disability
Tragic
12.8%
Exceptional
11.3%
Males
Tragic
12.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Females
Tragic
13.1%
Exceptional
11.8%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.1%
Fair
6.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
13.1%
Average
11.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.7%
Excellent
22.8%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.2%
Excellent
46.8%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Excellent
2.9%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Tragic
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Exceptional
2.3%