Immigrants from Oceania vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,366,137 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.251. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.013% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 13.1 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $61,976, a difference of 3.9%), wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $103,584, a difference of 0.12%), median family income ($106,453 compared to $106,188, a difference of 0.25%), and per capita income ($45,220 compared to $45,043, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 8.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (16.0% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.25%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.88%), and single mother poverty (28.7% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 31.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.33%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.35%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.78%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (46.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 5.2%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 4.6%), and family households (64.9% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.22%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.35%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 28.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 18.6%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.33%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 15.9%), master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (92.2% compared to 92.3%, a difference of 0.040%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.050%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 11.1%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 9.3%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.84%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%).