Immigrants from Chile vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 94,042,801 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.073. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.028% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 27.7 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 3.1%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $45,043, a difference of 2.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,159 compared to $95,698, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,440 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.13%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $103,584, a difference of 0.17%), and median male earnings ($55,954 compared to $56,064, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.7%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 7.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.28%), single female poverty (20.1% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 9.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.35%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.44%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.51%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.52%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.58%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.6%), single mother households (6.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 5.1%), and married-couple households (46.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.060%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 6.3%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 11.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 0.44%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%).