Immigrants from Canada vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 122,076,468 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Canada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.683. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Canada within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.780% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Canada corresponds to an increase of 779.7 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.2%), per capita income ($49,412 compared to $45,043, a difference of 9.7%), and median male earnings ($60,388 compared to $56,064, a difference of 7.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,373 compared to $40,739, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($53,411 compared to $52,374, a difference of 2.0%), and median earnings ($50,192 compared to $48,041, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 22.5%), married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 16.7%), and family poverty (7.8% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (20.2% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 0.38%), single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 0.53%), and single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.29%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 6.0%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.73%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 17.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 10.1%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 0.21%), family households (64.0% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 14.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.3%), professional degree (5.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.9%), and college, under 1 year (69.1% compared to 66.5%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.56%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Canada and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.6%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.0%), and cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 2.4%).