Immigrants from Uruguay vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,682,709 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Uruguay communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.431. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Uruguay within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.151% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Uruguay corresponds to an increase of 150.6 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($56,975 compared to $61,976, a difference of 8.8%), median family income ($98,205 compared to $106,188, a difference of 8.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($96,086 compared to $103,584, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,302 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.14%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($43,997 compared to $45,043, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 21.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.090%), poverty (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.16%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 0.37%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 15.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.16%), and unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.55%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.4% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.57%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.57%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 11.1%), divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 7.3%), and single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.0% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.15%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 7.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 31.4%), master's degree (15.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 11.1%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.17%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Uruguay and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 8.7%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.2%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.62%).