British West Indian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,490,404 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within British West Indian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.140. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in British West Indians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 British West Indians corresponds to a decrease of 8.7 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (18.0% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 38.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,571 compared to $103,584, a difference of 21.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($51,463 compared to $61,976, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,844 compared to $52,374, a difference of 1.0%), median female earnings ($40,299 compared to $40,739, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($44,552 compared to $48,041, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.9% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 50.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (17.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 48.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 1.7%), single father poverty (17.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 5.7%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (24.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 45.2%), male unemployment (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 36.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (15.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 35.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (29.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 34.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (70.0% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 27.6%), births to unmarried women (38.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 24.5%), and married-couple households (38.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.6%), and divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (29.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 197.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (3.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 71.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (70.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (35.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 55.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (11.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 60.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 51.9%), professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 32.3%), and master's degree (13.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), 1st grade (97.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.60%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.61%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between British West Indian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.6%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and hearing disability (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.42%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.75%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.2%).