White/Caucasian vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,879,825 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within White/Caucasian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.091. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Whites/Caucasians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.000% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Whites/Caucasians corresponds to an increase of 0.3 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 14.4%), median female earnings ($37,531 compared to $40,739, a difference of 8.6%), and per capita income ($42,180 compared to $45,043, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($53,925 compared to $56,064, a difference of 4.0%), householder income under 25 years ($50,336 compared to $52,374, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,668 compared to $95,698, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (14.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.9%), single female poverty (22.7% compared to 20.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.24%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (18.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 25.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.6% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 10.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.30%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 6.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (41.3% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.5% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.0%), married-couple households (48.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 8.9%), and currently married (48.6% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.33%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 42.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.1% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 10.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 22.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 41.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.59%), and ged/equivalency (86.2% compared to 85.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between White/Caucasian and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 44.4%), hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 28.6%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.2%), disability age 65 to 74 (24.2% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 6.4%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.8%).