Immigrants from Europe vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,723,446 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Europe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.276. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Europe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Europe corresponds to a decrease of 1.9 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,950 compared to $45,043, a difference of 13.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($106,817 compared to $95,698, a difference of 11.6%), and median male earnings ($62,057 compared to $56,064, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($64,828 compared to $61,976, a difference of 4.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,022 compared to $52,374, a difference of 5.1%), and median female earnings ($43,523 compared to $40,739, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 18.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 17.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (15.1% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 2.8%), single mother poverty (27.4% compared to 28.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and single male poverty (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 20.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.5% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 0.88%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.2% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.22%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.60%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 19.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.9%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.7% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 1.5%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.23, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 3.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.2% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.6%), professional degree (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.7%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%), 3rd grade (98.0% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.28%), and nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Europe and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.7%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 9.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 0.31%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.99%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%).