Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,492,641 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.649. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.044% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to an increase of 43.9 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,237 compared to $56,064, a difference of 5.3%), median family income ($101,354 compared to $106,188, a difference of 4.8%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $48,041, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $52,374, a difference of 0.51%), wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 0.85%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $87,553, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 12.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 11.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.5% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 0.090%), female poverty (13.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 0.39%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.49%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 18.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 10.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.5% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.83%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 9.3%), family households (65.6% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 4.6%), and married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.71%), average family size (3.26 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.85%), and family households with children (28.3% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.28%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 0.87%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 24.2%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 15.0%), and master's degree (14.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.14%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 7.0%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.51%).