Alaska Native vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 52,077,348 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Alaska Native communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.998. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaska Natives within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaska Natives corresponds to an increase of 171.3 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,558 compared to $45,043, a difference of 13.9%), median male earnings ($49,711 compared to $56,064, a difference of 12.8%), and median family income ($95,573 compared to $106,188, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($60,748 compared to $61,976, a difference of 2.0%), wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,000 compared to $52,374, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (15.6% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 31.2%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and single male poverty (15.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (16.8% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 1.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (17.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (14.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 82.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.5% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 63.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (7.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 62.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (10.3% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 17.1%), and female unemployment (6.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (81.6% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.7%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 76.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 0.33%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 47.0%), births to unmarried women (38.3% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 25.5%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (45.5% compared to 45.0%, a difference of 1.1%), married-couple households (45.6% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (65.1% compared to 62.7%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 74.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.3% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 23.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.6% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 2.6%), 1 or more vehicles in household (83.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 7.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 56.9%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.7%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 45.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (91.6% compared to 90.9%, a difference of 0.77%), nursery school (98.8% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and 3rd grade (98.6% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaska Native and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 155.8%), hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 56.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.8%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.9%).