Immigrants from Africa vs Immigrants from Uganda Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 125,955,535 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uganda within Immigrant from Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.476. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Uganda. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Africa corresponds to an increase of 14.5 Immigrants from Uganda.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (23.2% compared to 24.9%, a difference of 7.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,284 compared to $103,584, a difference of 6.5%), and median family income ($100,256 compared to $106,188, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,257 compared to $40,739, a difference of 1.2%), median earnings ($46,564 compared to $48,041, a difference of 3.2%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,609 compared to $52,374, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 9.5%), family poverty (9.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 0.66%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.80%), and male poverty (12.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 13.6%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.4%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.81%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 39.2%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.92%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.55%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.4% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 10.8%), births to unmarried women (33.0% compared to 30.5%, a difference of 8.2%), and married-couple households (42.9% compared to 44.6%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 0.19%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.36%), and average family size (3.25 compared to 3.23, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (12.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 25.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (51.8% compared to 55.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 12.5%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%), and master's degree (15.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.25%), 1st grade (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.25%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Africa and Immigrants from Uganda communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 6.3%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.2%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.14%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 0.14%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 0.89%).