New Zealander vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
New Zealander
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
New Zealanders
Guatemalans
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in New Zealander Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,447,837 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.828. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.817% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 817.5 Guatemalans.
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,766, a difference of 33.9%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $46,736, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,295, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,525, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,695, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
Income Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $50,575 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $115,230 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $95,146 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $51,246 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $61,199 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,446 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,294 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $105,085 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,286 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $67,333 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 22.6% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.3%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
Poverty Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Excellent 10.8% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.7% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.7% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Excellent 13.1% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Good 16.6% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Excellent 15.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Excellent 15.7% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Excellent 15.6% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Poor 13.2% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Average 21.0% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
Unemployment Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.2% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.9% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Excellent 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Poor 4.9% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.1% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.6% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
Labor Participation Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.7% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Good 79.7% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.2% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.1% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Fair 82.6% | Tragic 81.2% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
Family Structure Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Tragic 62.9% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Excellent 47.2% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.15 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.6% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 37.1% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.1% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 56.7% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 20.4% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Education Level Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.7% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.9% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.8% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.6% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.0% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.0% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.8% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 91.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 88.0% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 70.2% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 64.6% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 51.8% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 44.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 18.3% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 6.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.84%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
Disability Metric | New Zealander | Guatemalan |
Disability | Excellent 11.5% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Average 11.2% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.7% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Good 11.0% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 22.9% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Excellent 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.4% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.8% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |