New Zealander vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

New Zealander
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

New Zealanders

Guatemalans

Excellent
Poor
8,769
SOCIAL INDEX
85.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
50th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in New Zealander Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,447,837 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.828. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.817% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 817.5 Guatemalans.
New Zealander Integration in Guatemalan Communities

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,766, a difference of 33.9%), median male earnings ($61,199 compared to $46,736, a difference of 30.9%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $88,295, a difference of 30.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $51,525, a difference of 3.4%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $35,695, a difference of 18.9%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.5%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$50,575
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,230
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$95,146
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$51,246
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,199
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,446
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,294
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,085
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,286
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,333
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.7%
Exceptional
22.6%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 58.3%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 45.4%), and family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.070%), single male poverty (13.2% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 4.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.8%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.7%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
21.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.6%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Excellent
15.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Excellent
15.7%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Excellent
15.6%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Poor
13.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Average
21.0%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Poor
16.6%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Average
29.1%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
14.4%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.0%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 8.3%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.1%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Good
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.12%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.18%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Good
79.7%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Good
75.2%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.1%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Fair
82.6%
Tragic
81.2%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 41.8%), single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 36.4%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.6%), family households (62.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (27.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 6.6%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
Family Households
Tragic
62.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.15
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
37.1%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 7.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.7%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
90.1%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
56.7%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.4%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Good
6.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 107.0%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 77.4%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 71.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.7%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.8%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.9%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.0%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.0%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.8%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.1%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.0%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
70.2%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.6%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
51.8%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
44.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.5%
Tragic
1.4%

New Zealander vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.1%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 11.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.9% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.84%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and cognitive disability (17.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.8%).
New Zealander vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricNew ZealanderGuatemalan
Disability
Excellent
11.5%
Good
11.6%
Males
Average
11.2%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Excellent
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Good
11.0%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
22.9%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.2%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Fair
17.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.6%