Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Guatemalans

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 126,924,439 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.248% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 247.8 Guatemalans.
Luxembourger Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 21.3%), per capita income ($45,663 compared to $37,766, a difference of 20.9%), and median male earnings ($56,300 compared to $46,736, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,525, a difference of 2.3%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $35,695, a difference of 11.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $54,526, a difference of 11.8%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.6%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 81.4%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 62.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 57.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 0.81%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.1%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
14.4%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.1%), unemployment (4.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 32.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 12.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 14.4%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 27.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.8%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
81.2%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 37.9%), single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.9%), and births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.1%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.0%), and divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.2%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
37.1%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 105.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 9.1%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 6.3%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 117.8%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 37.2%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 33.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 19.4%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.32%), disability (11.3% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.4%).
Luxembourger vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerGuatemalan
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Good
11.6%
Males
Good
11.1%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.6%