Laotian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Laotian
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Laotians
Guatemalans
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Laotian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,833,547 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 128.4 Guatemalans.
Laotian vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $88,295, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $82,331, a difference of 27.5%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $46,736, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,695, a difference of 18.0%).
Income Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,041 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $112,859 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $94,990 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $50,343 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $59,351 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $42,133 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $54,369 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $104,993 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $111,051 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $66,306 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Poor 26.4% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 49.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.6%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.1%).
Poverty Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.1% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.2% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.2% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 14.7% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.3% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.5% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.3% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.0% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.6% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Fair 12.3% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.0% | Tragic 14.4% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Unemployment Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Average 5.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Good 11.5% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Excellent 17.2% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Excellent 4.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Excellent 4.4% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Average 5.4% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Poor 5.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.2% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 6.5% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Labor Participation Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Average 79.6% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.9% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 74.1% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Average 84.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Poor 84.2% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Good 82.9% | Tragic 81.2% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.5%).
Family Structure Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.8% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.5% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 48.4% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.26 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.8% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Excellent 47.4% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.2% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Exceptional 28.5% | Tragic 37.1% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.1% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 91.0% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 58.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.5% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.4%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Education Level Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Poor 2.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.8% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Poor 97.8% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.7% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.6% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Poor 97.1% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Poor 96.8% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 95.7% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 95.4% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Fair 94.6% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Fair 93.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Average 92.6% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Good 91.3% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.3% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.5% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.5% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.8% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.9% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.0% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.4% |
Laotian vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Laotian | Guatemalan |
Disability | Exceptional 11.0% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.6% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.4% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.2% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.1% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Poor 47.9% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.0% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.3% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Excellent 2.4% | Tragic 2.6% |