Laotian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Laotian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Laotians

Guatemalans

Good
Poor
8,033
SOCIAL INDEX
77.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
91st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Laotian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 204,833,547 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Laotian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Laotians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.128% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Laotians corresponds to a decrease of 128.4 Guatemalans.
Laotian Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Laotian vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($112,859 compared to $88,295, a difference of 27.8%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($104,993 compared to $82,331, a difference of 27.5%), and median male earnings ($59,351 compared to $46,736, a difference of 27.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,369 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.6%), and median female earnings ($42,133 compared to $35,695, a difference of 18.0%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricLaotianGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,041
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$112,859
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$94,990
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,343
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$59,351
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,133
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,369
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$104,993
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$111,051
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$66,306
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Poor
26.4%
Exceptional
22.6%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 49.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 47.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 47.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.2% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 7.6%), single father poverty (15.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.4%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.1%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricLaotianGuatemalan
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.7%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.9%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.3%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.0%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
14.4%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 4.6%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 6.9%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLaotianGuatemalan
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Average
5.3%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Excellent
4.6%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Average
5.4%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Poor
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.2%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.3%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.85%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLaotianGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Average
79.6%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.9%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Poor
84.4%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Average
84.7%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Poor
84.2%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Good
82.9%
Tragic
81.2%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.9%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.5%), and births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.85%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.26 compared to 3.40, a difference of 4.5%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLaotianGuatemalan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.8%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.5%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.4%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.26
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.8%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.4%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.2%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
28.5%
Tragic
37.1%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 21.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 7.1%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLaotianGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
9.1%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.0%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.6%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.4%
Exceptional
7.0%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 63.4%), no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 55.7%), and professional degree (5.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 51.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricLaotianGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.7%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Fair
94.6%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Fair
93.6%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Average
92.6%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.5%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.8%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.9%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.0%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.0%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.4%

Laotian vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Laotian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 15.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 2.4%).
Laotian vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricLaotianGuatemalan
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Good
11.6%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Good
11.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Poor
47.9%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Average
17.3%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Excellent
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%