Turkish vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 237,343,198 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.075% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to a decrease of 74.9 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $37,766, a difference of 38.7%), median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $46,736, a difference of 37.5%), and median family income ($121,202 compared to $88,295, a difference of 37.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.3%), wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 22.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $54,526, a difference of 24.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 63.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 58.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 56.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 25.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.0%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.0%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.82%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.0%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 40.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 35.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.5%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 5.3%), and average family size (3.16 compared to 3.40, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 93.5%), doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 88.9%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 23.1%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.070%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 3.0%), and cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%).