Immigrants from Northern Africa vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,649,698 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Northern Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.647. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Northern Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.715% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Northern Africa corresponds to an increase of 715.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($58,008 compared to $46,736, a difference of 24.1%), per capita income ($46,531 compared to $37,766, a difference of 23.2%), and median family income ($108,161 compared to $88,295, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $51,525, a difference of 3.2%), wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 11.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,522 compared to $54,526, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 35.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.8% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (16.0% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 33.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.1%), single father poverty (15.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 8.4%), and single male poverty (11.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 16.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.3% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.6% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.91%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.4%), births to unmarried women (29.5% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 25.8%), and single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.7%), family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and average family size (3.22 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.1%), no vehicles in household (12.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (87.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.3% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (17.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 57.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 50.0%), and professional degree (5.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Northern Africa and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (22.4% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.1%), cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%).