Comanche vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 100,145,184 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.213. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.081% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to a decrease of 81.3 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 10.7%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $51,525, a difference of 8.4%), and median male earnings ($48,202 compared to $46,736, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $35,695, a difference of 0.090%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,152 compared to $82,331, a difference of 0.22%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $88,295, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (16.0% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 16.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and poverty (15.0% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 31.7%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 24.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 22.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.4%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 6.2%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 17.0%), divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 11.2%), and single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (44.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.2%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.81%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and college, under 1 year (61.4% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 8.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 40.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 30.8%), and male disability (14.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.5%), cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.5%).