Indian (Asian) vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 386,650,749 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Indian (Asian) communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.078. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Indians (Asian) within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Indians (Asian) corresponds to a decrease of 2.5 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($119,496 compared to $82,331, a difference of 45.1%), per capita income ($53,874 compared to $37,766, a difference of 42.6%), and median family income ($125,312 compared to $88,295, a difference of 41.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($58,239 compared to $51,525, a difference of 13.0%), wage/income gap (26.4% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 16.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,238 compared to $54,526, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.1% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 61.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (13.4% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 60.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.3% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 60.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 5.6%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.7% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 16.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 37.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 28.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 2.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 11.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 55.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 50.1%), and births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 46.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.1% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.14%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and average family size (3.24 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.9%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 3.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 106.1%), professional degree (6.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 88.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 74.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Indian (Asian) and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.8%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.5% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.9%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 5.4%), and cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 5.4%).