Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from the Azores
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabwe
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from the Azores

Guatemalans

Poor
Poor
1,552
SOCIAL INDEX
13.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
302nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from the Azores Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,156,355 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from the Azores communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.374. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from the Azores within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.227% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from the Azores corresponds to a decrease of 226.6 Guatemalans.
Immigrants from the Azores Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.2% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.1%), median male earnings ($53,503 compared to $46,736, a difference of 14.5%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($92,322 compared to $82,331, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,621 compared to $51,525, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($52,121 compared to $54,526, a difference of 4.6%), and per capita income ($39,608 compared to $37,766, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,608
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,402
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Tragic
$80,357
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Fair
$45,812
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Fair
$53,503
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$38,573
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,621
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Fair
$92,322
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,138
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$52,121
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.2%
Exceptional
22.6%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (16.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 27.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.5% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 1.3%), single mother poverty (32.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 2.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.2% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 2.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Tragic
10.3%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
15.8%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Fair
16.8%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Tragic
13.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Tragic
23.5%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Excellent
15.9%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.2%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
12.9%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.2%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
16.4%
Tragic
14.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 30.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.7% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.2%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
Unemployment
Tragic
6.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.8%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.2%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
8.1%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.7%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.0%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
10.7%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.3%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.0%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 17.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (81.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.69%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.6% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 0.74%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
77.8%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
41.7%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
83.1%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
81.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.6%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
80.1%
Tragic
81.2%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (39.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 6.6%), average family size (3.21 compared to 3.40, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (45.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.64%), divorced or separated (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and single mother households (7.5% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 1.7%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
Family Households
Exceptional
65.6%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
45.2%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.21
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.5%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Tragic
45.1%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.3%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
39.6%
Tragic
37.1%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 13.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.9%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.4%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.5%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.5%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 22.7%), master's degree (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (78.7% compared to 78.5%, a difference of 0.20%), 5th grade (95.1% compared to 94.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and nursery school (97.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.0%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.9%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.6%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.1%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
93.0%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
92.5%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Tragic
89.0%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
87.2%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.3%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.8%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.7%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
54.7%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
48.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
35.6%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
27.3%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
10.2%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Tragic
2.8%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.4%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from the Azores and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (2.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 82.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 34.5%), and hearing disability (3.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.9% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.85%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 1.8%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from the Azores vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from the AzoresGuatemalan
Disability
Tragic
14.2%
Good
11.6%
Males
Tragic
13.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Tragic
14.9%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
2.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.7%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
8.5%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
14.3%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
26.0%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
50.9%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Tragic
7.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Tragic
3.0%
Tragic
2.6%