Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Oceania
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Guatemalan
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Oceania

Guatemalans

Average
Poor
6,183
SOCIAL INDEX
59.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
161st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from Oceania Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 263,453,424 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.035. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to an increase of 6.7 Guatemalans.
Immigrants from Oceania Integration in Guatemalan Communities

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($106,453 compared to $88,295, a difference of 20.6%), per capita income ($45,220 compared to $37,766, a difference of 19.7%), and median male earnings ($55,712 compared to $46,736, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,525, a difference of 4.2%), median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $35,695, a difference of 12.9%), and wage/income gap (25.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 13.4%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Income
Income MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
Per Capita Income
Excellent
$45,220
Tragic
$37,766
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,453
Tragic
$88,295
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,100
Tragic
$75,961
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,617
Tragic
$41,205
Median Male Earnings
Good
$55,712
Tragic
$46,736
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,297
Tragic
$35,695
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,680
Poor
$51,525
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,623
Tragic
$82,331
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,705
Tragic
$87,705
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$64,416
Tragic
$54,526
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.6%
Exceptional
22.6%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 40.1%), family poverty (8.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 34.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.9%), single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 7.7%), and single male poverty (12.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 11.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
Poverty
Average
12.3%
Tragic
15.3%
Families
Good
8.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Males
Average
11.2%
Tragic
13.8%
Females
Average
13.3%
Tragic
16.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Tragic
20.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Average
13.5%
Tragic
16.4%
Children Under 5 years
Good
16.9%
Tragic
21.6%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Tragic
21.2%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
16.0%
Tragic
21.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
16.1%
Tragic
21.4%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Good
20.7%
Tragic
23.8%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.4%
Poor
16.6%
Single Mothers
Good
28.7%
Tragic
32.9%
Married Couples
Good
5.0%
Tragic
7.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Excellent
10.4%
Tragic
13.5%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
14.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.4%
Tragic
14.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%), female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Males
Average
5.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Females
Good
5.2%
Tragic
6.0%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
12.1%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Tragic
18.6%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Poor
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Tragic
4.9%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Fair
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Tragic
8.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.1%
Tragic
9.3%
Women w/ Children < 18
Excellent
5.3%
Tragic
6.3%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 6.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.60%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Exceptional
65.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Poor
79.3%
Tragic
78.7%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
37.9%
Tragic
35.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Good
75.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
84.2%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.9%
Tragic
83.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.1%
Tragic
81.2%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 22.1%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.9% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.49%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (28.1% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
Family Households
Exceptional
64.9%
Exceptional
65.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.1%
Exceptional
28.9%
Married-couple Households
Good
46.9%
Tragic
43.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.29
Exceptional
3.40
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Tragic
3.0%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Tragic
7.7%
Currently Married
Average
46.5%
Tragic
42.9%
Divorced or Separated
Good
11.9%
Fair
12.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.6%
Tragic
37.1%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.6%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.7%
Poor
11.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.4%
Poor
89.2%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
57.5%
Tragic
54.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
21.8%
Excellent
20.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.6%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 35.3%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 31.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
No Schooling Completed
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
3.5%
Nursery School
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Tragic
96.3%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Tragic
96.0%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.3%
Tragic
95.3%
5th Grade
Poor
97.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Tragic
94.2%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Tragic
91.1%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Tragic
89.9%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Tragic
87.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.2%
Tragic
86.4%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Fair
90.9%
Tragic
84.6%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.8%
Tragic
82.0%
GED/Equivalency
Fair
85.5%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Average
65.6%
Tragic
56.8%
College, 1 year or more
Average
59.4%
Tragic
51.2%
Associate's Degree
Fair
45.8%
Tragic
38.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
37.3%
Tragic
31.0%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.7%
Tragic
11.7%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.5%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.2%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 8.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.93%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%).
Immigrants from Oceania vs Guatemalan Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from OceaniaGuatemalan
Disability
Fair
11.8%
Good
11.6%
Males
Fair
11.4%
Good
11.1%
Females
Good
12.1%
Good
12.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Excellent
5.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Excellent
6.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.4%
Poor
11.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Poor
24.0%
Tragic
25.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
48.0%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Average
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Tragic
17.8%
Ambulatory
Good
6.1%
Fair
6.2%
Self-Care
Fair
2.5%
Tragic
2.6%