Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 174,838,183 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.084. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.174% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 174.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($51,770 compared to $37,766, a difference of 37.1%), median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $46,736, a difference of 33.1%), and median family income ($116,165 compared to $88,295, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,352 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.5%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $54,526, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 53.6%), family poverty (7.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 52.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 8.3%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 23.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 19.9%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 45.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 44.0%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.8%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.14 compared to 3.40, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.020%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.95%), and no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 89.9%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 67.8%), and doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 21.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.0%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.87%), male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.4%).