Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Guatemalans
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 110,715,682 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.398. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.478% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 478.1 Guatemalans.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $37,766, a difference of 25.5%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $88,295, a difference of 23.3%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $46,736, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.76%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 12.0%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $35,695, a difference of 16.3%).
Income Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,394 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,830 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $89,496 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,913 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,352 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $41,527 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Fair $51,914 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Excellent $97,880 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $104,992 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,643 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Good 25.3% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 61.9%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 44.9%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 3.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 4.5%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 9.4%).
Poverty Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.6% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Exceptional 8.2% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Good 19.8% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.6% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.8% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.2% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Good 12.6% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Good 16.1% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 28.1% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 10.3% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 9.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 22.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.7%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.5% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 10.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (10.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 11.7%).
Unemployment Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Exceptional 4.9% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 10.8% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.5% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.2% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.6% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.0% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.1% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 8.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.2% | Tragic 6.3% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.74%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
Labor Participation Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.8% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.5% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.0% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 75.9% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 85.1% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.2% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.2% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 32.2%), single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 24.3%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.2%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.8%), and family households with children (27.8% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Average 46.3% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.19 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Average 46.7% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Excellent 30.3% | Tragic 37.1% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.9%), no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 11.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 2.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 90.2% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.6% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Fair 19.1% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Poor 6.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 85.5%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 54.8%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 52.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.7%).
Education Level Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.8% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 97.4% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 96.5% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 96.3% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 95.5% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.4% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 93.4% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 90.3% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 87.1% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 68.9% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 63.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.5% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.6% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.4% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.4% |
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 14.8%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 14.3%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.47%), cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 1.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Disability Metric | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Guatemalan |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.8% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.6% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Fair 6.7% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.6% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.3% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Good 47.2% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Good 3.0% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Poor 17.5% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.6% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 2.6% |