Immigrants from Philippines vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 375,531,605 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.005. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to a decrease of 0.3 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $82,331, a difference of 25.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $87,705, a difference of 23.7%), and median household income ($93,899 compared to $75,961, a difference of 23.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.1%), householder income under 25 years ($57,930 compared to $51,525, a difference of 12.4%), and median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $35,695, a difference of 15.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 48.4%), child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 48.1%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.3% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 47.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 24.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (16.7% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.75%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.9% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 25.9%), single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.7%), and births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 0.35%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.40, a difference of 0.88%), and family households (68.3% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 18.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 34.2%), bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.5%), and associate's degree (45.0% compared to 38.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.92%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.92%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 12.3%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.010%), disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 0.49%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.5%).