Immigrants from Central America vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 405,932,439 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.481. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.072% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to an increase of 72.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 9.0%), per capita income ($34,974 compared to $37,766, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $35,695, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $51,525, a difference of 0.99%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $87,705, a difference of 2.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($53,420 compared to $54,526, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 5.6%), single female poverty (24.8% compared to 23.8%, a difference of 4.1%), and receiving food stamps (15.0% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 0.11%), child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.6%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.65%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.43%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (31.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 7.1%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 5.6%), and single mother households (8.1% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.62%), births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and single father households (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 23.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 22.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 8.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.0%), and master's degree (10.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 17.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (96.2% compared to 96.3%, a difference of 0.15%), nursery school (96.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (96.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.16%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.1%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 0.080%), female disability (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.16%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.21%).