Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison
COMPARE
Ecuadorian
Guatemalan
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Ecuadorians
Guatemalans
2,199
SOCIAL INDEX
19.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
267th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Guatemalan Integration in Ecuadorian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 281,067,976 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Ecuadorian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ecuadorians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.024% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ecuadorians corresponds to a decrease of 24.0 Guatemalans.
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($91,574 compared to $82,331, a difference of 11.2%), per capita income ($41,958 compared to $37,766, a difference of 11.1%), and median male earnings ($51,596 compared to $46,736, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($54,958 compared to $54,526, a difference of 0.79%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,911 compared to $51,525, a difference of 4.6%).
Income Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
Per Capita Income | Poor $41,958 | Tragic $37,766 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $95,114 | Tragic $88,295 |
Median Household Income | Poor $82,070 | Tragic $75,961 |
Median Earnings | Poor $45,214 | Tragic $41,205 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $51,596 | Tragic $46,736 |
Median Female Earnings | Fair $39,117 | Tragic $35,695 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,911 | Poor $51,525 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Poor $91,574 | Tragic $82,331 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $93,739 | Tragic $87,705 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,958 | Tragic $54,526 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Exceptional 22.6% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 14.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (18.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 13.6%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.86%), receiving food stamps (14.9% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 3.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 3.5%).
Poverty Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
Poverty | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 15.3% |
Families | Tragic 10.8% | Tragic 11.7% |
Males | Tragic 12.7% | Tragic 13.8% |
Females | Tragic 15.3% | Tragic 16.7% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 20.7% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 14.3% | Tragic 16.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.2% | Tragic 21.6% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 21.2% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 19.3% | Tragic 21.1% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 21.4% |
Single Males | Excellent 12.5% | Tragic 13.8% |
Single Females | Poor 21.6% | Tragic 23.8% |
Single Fathers | Fair 16.5% | Poor 16.6% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 30.8% | Tragic 32.9% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 7.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 14.0% | Tragic 13.5% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.7% | Tragic 14.8% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.9% | Tragic 14.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.5% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 10.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.36%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
Unemployment | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.8% |
Males | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 5.6% |
Females | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 13.3% | Tragic 12.1% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.5% | Tragic 18.6% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 11.8% | Poor 10.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.4% | Tragic 7.1% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.0% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 4.9% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.3% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.2% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Tragic 5.8% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.6% |
Seniors > 75 | Good 8.6% | Fair 8.8% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Poor 7.9% | Tragic 8.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Tragic 9.3% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.11%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.81%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.83%).
Labor Participation Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Exceptional 65.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Fair 79.4% | Tragic 78.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 31.4% | Tragic 35.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 72.4% | Good 75.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Poor 84.4% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Fair 84.2% | Tragic 83.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 82.3% | Tragic 81.2% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 24.2%), births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 11.6%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.40%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.51%), and currently married (43.6% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.0% | Exceptional 65.2% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 27.8% | Exceptional 28.9% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.5% | Tragic 43.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.32 | Exceptional 3.40 |
Single Father Households | Fair 2.4% | Tragic 3.0% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 7.7% |
Currently Married | Tragic 43.6% | Tragic 42.9% |
Divorced or Separated | Exceptional 11.7% | Fair 12.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Poor 33.3% | Tragic 37.1% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (22.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 107.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 55.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 42.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (77.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 14.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (42.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 28.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 42.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 22.8% | Poor 11.0% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 77.9% | Poor 89.2% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 42.0% | Tragic 54.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 20.1% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 4.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (14.0% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 19.1%), no schooling completed (3.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 17.1%), and bachelor's degree (35.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.52%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 0.53%).
Education Level Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.0% | Tragic 3.5% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.1% | Tragic 96.6% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.0% | Tragic 96.5% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Tragic 96.3% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.7% | Tragic 96.0% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.4% | Tragic 95.3% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Tragic 94.8% |
6th Grade | Tragic 95.5% | Tragic 94.2% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.0% | Tragic 91.7% |
8th Grade | Tragic 93.6% | Tragic 91.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 91.9% | Tragic 89.9% |
10th Grade | Tragic 90.6% | Tragic 87.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 89.6% | Tragic 86.4% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.0% | Tragic 84.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 85.1% | Tragic 82.0% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.7% | Tragic 78.5% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 59.3% | Tragic 56.8% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.3% | Tragic 51.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 43.0% | Tragic 38.5% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 35.4% | Tragic 31.0% |
Master's Degree | Poor 14.0% | Tragic 11.7% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.9% | Tragic 3.5% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Tragic 1.4% |
Ecuadorian vs Guatemalan Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ecuadorian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 12.0%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 0.66%), and ambulatory disability (6.1% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Disability Metric | Ecuadorian | Guatemalan |
Disability | Exceptional 11.2% | Good 11.6% |
Males | Exceptional 10.5% | Good 11.1% |
Females | Exceptional 11.9% | Good 12.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Good 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Good 5.5% | Excellent 5.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.8% | Excellent 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.7% | Poor 11.7% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Fair 23.6% | Tragic 25.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Average 47.4% | Tragic 49.0% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.5% | Exceptional 2.8% |
Cognitive | Average 17.2% | Tragic 17.8% |
Ambulatory | Good 6.1% | Fair 6.2% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Tragic 2.6% |