Russian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 387,598,734 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.757. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.047% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to a decrease of 47.2 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $37,766, a difference of 40.7%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $46,736, a difference of 36.8%), and median family income ($120,487 compared to $88,295, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $35,695, a difference of 23.7%), and wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 62.9%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 57.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (12.5% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 10.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 23.5%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 21.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 0.60%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 0.95%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 0.63%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.1%), and births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 2.9%), divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 6.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.56%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 107.4%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 82.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 80.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.7%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 16.1%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.17%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.4%), and female disability (11.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 2.7%).