Native/Alaskan vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,266,429 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.144. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $37,766, a difference of 13.5%), median household income ($67,879 compared to $75,961, a difference of 11.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $87,705, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $46,736, a difference of 4.4%), householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $54,526, a difference of 4.7%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $35,695, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 42.5%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 34.6%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (20.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 4.8%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.2%), and single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 41.1%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 37.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 3.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.8%), single father households (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (42.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 0.27%), married-couple households (43.5% compared to 43.3%, a difference of 0.46%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.40, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 13.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.75%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 54.1%), master's degree (9.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 18.3%), and bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 56.8%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 58.7%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 49.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 2.2%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 9.1%).