Latvian vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 192,196,252 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.168% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 167.5 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $37,766, a difference of 39.4%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,295, a difference of 36.2%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $46,736, a difference of 35.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,525, a difference of 2.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $35,695, a difference of 23.1%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 80.5%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 65.5%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 6.3%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 29.1%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 28.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 2.5%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 5.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 9.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 47.8%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 45.0%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 33.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 3.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.6%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 124.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 82.5%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 80.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.3%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.3%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 0.060%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.9%).