Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 377,249,777 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.436. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.018% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 18.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $46,736, a difference of 47.5%), median family income ($125,956 compared to $88,295, a difference of 42.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $82,331, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $51,525, a difference of 12.2%), householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $54,526, a difference of 28.6%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 69.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 68.0%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (12.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 14.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 17.6%), and single male poverty (10.9% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 26.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 26.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 25.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 7.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 3.5%), in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 50.8%), births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 50.4%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 1.8%), family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.0%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.40, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 2.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 86.2%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 76.3%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 73.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 31.7%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.6% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.6%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 8.9%).