Argentinean vs Guatemalan Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 265,246,574 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.162. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Guatemalans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to an increase of 25.1 Guatemalans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,862 compared to $37,766, a difference of 32.0%), median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $46,736, a difference of 28.6%), and median family income ($112,665 compared to $88,295, a difference of 27.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $51,525, a difference of 5.1%), median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $35,695, a difference of 17.5%), and wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 19.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 46.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 45.2%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 5.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 10.2%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 20.7%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.7%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.2%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 35.5%, a difference of 6.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.2%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.6%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.2%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 31.1%), and births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 23.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.2%, a difference of 0.38%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 20.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 54.1%, a difference of 0.71%), and no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 70.9%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.5%, a difference of 66.8%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 61.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Guatemalan communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 24.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 20.5%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 6.1%).