Brazilian vs Immigrants from Middle Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 161,200,933 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Middle Africa within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.284. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Immigrants from Middle Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Immigrants from Middle Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.4%, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $82,254, a difference of 19.5%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $39,529, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $58,375, a difference of 5.3%), median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $37,965, a difference of 6.6%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $43,416, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 24.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 23.2%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 11.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 67.7%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 76.6%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 0.13%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 23.6%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 34.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 1.2%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.9% compared to 61.9%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 7.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 89.9%, a difference of 0.15%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 53.4%, a difference of 0.62%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 18.6%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and master's degree (16.5% compared to 14.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.35%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Middle Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 14.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.26%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 0.48%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.3%).